Breaking news from the world of business
Companies

Public GitHub Data Puts OnlyFans Subscription Pricing in Context

Public GitHub Data Puts OnlyFans Subscription Pricing in Context

A $9.99 monthly subscription is a useful starting point for understanding OnlyFans pricing. That is the median listed price among paid profiles in the June 2026 directory sample published by OnlyFans Statistics and Best OnlyFans Reviews. It describes one part of the platform's subscription economy, with the underlying aggregate tables now available through public GitHub repositories.

The sample covers 100,200 unique profiles identified across 401,727 public directory listings and 1,057 niches. Its size provides context for the published distributions, while the collection method matters just as much: directory-listed profiles do not necessarily reflect the wider OnlyFans creator population.

Reading the price behind the headline

The $9.99 figure applies to profiles with a paid subscription in the sample. It is not the median amount a fan spends, and it does not establish how much a creator earns. A listed price alone cannot reveal the number of paying subscribers or their total purchases.

The published files also describe accumulated likes and content-library characteristics. These offer additional context about the sampled profiles, but likes should not be interpreted as revenue. The downloadable creator dataset contains aggregate distributions rather than individual profile records.

Making the published figures easier to inspect

The OnlyFans Statistics repository brings together 18 CSV files, two JSON files and 39 SVG charts. The related creator dataset repository contains five CSV files and two JSON files. Together, these resources give writers and analysts access to published tables, source notes and revision histories in formats that are easier to reference and reuse.

The OnlyFans Statistics data resources provide an entry point to the available materials. The Best OnlyFans Reviews source notes explain the related project's source context. A specific repository revision can identify the version used in an article or analysis. The GitHub publication makes an existing June collection accessible through another channel; it is not a new survey.

Methodology questions and suggested corrections can be raised through the OnlyFans Statistics data discussions and the creator dataset discussions.

OnlyFans Statistics and Best OnlyFans Reviews are independent projects, unaffiliated with OnlyFans or Fenix International Ltd. They share parts of the underlying data, so their overlapping findings should be read as related publications rather than independent confirmations.

← More Companies news